I read the article and felt it a bit superficial. It didn't really cover open access and open source. The latter is the underlying technical and inspirational force. And the former is an embodiment of a real change.
PLoS is actually doing very important experiments with scientific publishing. PLoS ONE should be an important case to discuss "Science 2.0".
I read the article and felt
I read the article and felt it a bit superficial. It didn't really cover open access and open source. The latter is the underlying technical and inspirational force. And the former is an embodiment of a real change.
PLoS is actually doing very important experiments with scientific publishing. PLoS ONE should be an important case to discuss "Science 2.0".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[http://rl.rockiestech.com]
洛基开放文化实验室，使用开源方法来推动社会文化进步